IAS 2025 Prelims Crash Course | NDA I 2025 Written Exam Coaching | CDS I 2025 written Exam Coaching | AFCAT Coaching. UPSC Civil Service 2026 Admission open now | NDA 2025 Vacation batch starts soon | NDA 2025 Crash Course starts in March

Thailand–Cambodia Border Dispute: Causes, Recent Clashes and Implications

thailand–cambodia border dispute

Introduction

Thailand and Cambodia have witnessed renewed military clashes along their shared border, marking one of the most serious escalations in recent years. The violence has resulted in casualties on both sides, displacement of civilians, and the collapse of a fragile ceasefire brokered earlier in 2025 with international involvement.
The dispute is long-standing, rooted in colonial-era border demarcation, and periodically resurfaces due to territorial claims, nationalism, and political instability.


Background of the Border Dispute

Colonial Legacy

  • The dispute dates back to the early 20th century, when borders were drawn during the French colonial rule of Cambodia.

  • Maps prepared by French authorities left certain areas ambiguously demarcated, leading to overlapping claims.

  • Thailand disputes some of these colonial-era boundaries, especially in areas surrounding historical monuments.


Preah Vihear Temple Dispute

  • A major flashpoint is the 11th-century Preah Vihear Temple, located near the Thailand–Cambodia border.

  • In 2008, Cambodia’s attempt to register the temple as a UNESCO World Heritage Site triggered strong protests in Thailand.

  • Although the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled largely in Cambodia’s favour, Thailand disputes surrounding territory claims.

  • This episode intensified nationalist sentiments and led to periodic military standoffs.


Recent Escalations (2025)

May 2025 Incident

  • Tensions escalated after a Cambodian soldier was killed during a border clash.

  • Diplomatic relations deteriorated to their lowest point in over a decade.


July 2025 Clashes

  • Both sides exchanged heavy gunfire, rockets, and air strikes.

  • At least 48 people were killed, and thousands were displaced.

  • Thailand accused Cambodia of firing rockets, while Cambodia blamed Thai aggression.

  • The violence prompted international concern, leading to external mediation.


December 2025 Clashes

  • Fighting resumed in December, despite an existing ceasefire.

  • Thailand’s claim:

    • Cambodian forces fired first in Ubon Ratchathani province.

    • Thailand responded with air strikes on military targets.

  • Cambodia’s claim:

    • Thai forces initiated attacks in Preah Vihear province.

    • Cambodia initially refrained from retaliation to respect the ceasefire.

  • Accusations include:

    • Use of rockets, drones, and air strikes

    • Attacks affecting civilian areas on both sides

  • Casualties include Thai soldiers and Cambodian civilians.


Areas Affected

  • Thailand: Ubon Ratchathani, Buriram, Surin, Si Sa Ket, Sa Kaeo, Trat

  • Cambodia: Banteay Meanchey, Battambang, Pursat, Oddar Meanchey, Preah Vihear


Economic and Diplomatic Measures

  • Cambodia imposed border restrictions, including:

    • Ban on imports from Thailand (fruits, vegetables)

    • Suspension of power and internet supplies

  • Both countries reinforced troop deployments along the border.


Role of International Mediation

US and Regional Mediation

  • US President Donald Trump, with support from Malaysia, mediated a ceasefire after the July clashes.

  • The agreement included:

    • Withdrawal of heavy weapons

    • Deployment of interim observers

    • Release of detained Cambodian soldiers

  • Thailand later paused the agreement, citing unresolved security threats.

  • Cambodia claimed continued commitment to the ceasefire.


Why Has the Ceasefire Failed?

  1. Mutual distrust between armed forces

  2. Ambiguous borders and unresolved territorial claims

  3. Domestic political instability in both countries

  4. Nationalist pressures limiting leadership flexibility

  5. Lack of a robust enforcement and monitoring mechanism


Current Situation and Future Outlook

  • Both sides accuse each other of violating the ceasefire.

  • International actors have urged restraint, but escalation risks remain.

  • Analysts warn of:

    • Absence of strong political leadership

    • Possibility of repeated cycles of violence and de-escalation


Travel Advisory

  • Foreign governments advise against non-essential travel within 50 km of the border on both sides due to security risks.


Implications for the Region (UPSC Mains Value Addition)

Regional Stability

  • Threatens ASEAN unity and regional peace.

  • Undermines confidence in regional conflict-resolution mechanisms.

Humanitarian Impact

  • Civilian displacement

  • Damage to livelihoods in border regions

Lessons for International Relations

  • Importance of:

    • Clear border demarcation

    • Confidence-building measures

    • Neutral third-party monitoring


Way Forward

  • Revival of bilateral dialogue mechanisms

  • Acceptance of international arbitration or ICJ rulings

  • Strengthening ASEAN’s role in preventive diplomacy

  • Demilitarisation of sensitive zones

  • Community-level cross-border cooperation


UPSC Prelims Pointers

  • Dispute origin: French colonial-era border demarcation

  • Key site: Preah Vihear Temple

  • International body involved earlier: ICJ

  • Nature of conflict: Territorial dispute + nationalism

  • Region: Mainland Southeast Asia


Conclusion

The Thailand–Cambodia border conflict highlights how historical disputes, unresolved boundaries, and domestic politics can destabilise regional peace even in the presence of ceasefire agreements. Sustainable resolution requires political will, trust-building, and effective international mediation, making it a significant case study for UPSC aspirants in International Relations and conflict management.

Download PDF

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top